http://sarasotaneurology.com/2010/01/15/jama-reports-prp-not-effective-a-poorly-designed-study/ Interesting Topics in Neurology Sat, 05 Jun 2010 04:38:01 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://sarasotaneurology.com/2010/01/15/jama-reports-prp-not-effective-a-poorly-designed-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4075 Robert Brandt Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:49:24 +0000 http://sarasotaneurology.com/?p=92#comment-4075 It is surprising that with all of the positive research and publications regarding the efficacy of PRP that a negative report would be released and picked up by the Associated Press. Could this be the work of some insurance company or a fearfull competitor? I have been involved with PRP since its genesis and have treated more than 40,000 patients. I am disappointed that a flawed study such as this one would have the credibility to be published in JAMA. It is surprising that with all of the positive research and publications regarding the efficacy of PRP that a negative report would be released and picked up by the Associated Press. Could this be the work of some insurance company or a fearfull competitor? I have been involved with PRP since its genesis and have treated more than 40,000 patients. I am disappointed that a flawed study such as this one would have the credibility to be published in JAMA.

]]>